Thanks for sharing more voices from MADlib users and the community. Maybe we can try to explore more possibilities for both the MADlib and Cloudberry projects.
Best, Dianjin Wang On Fri, Apr 4, 2025 at 10:32 AM Sharma, Abhishek <[email protected]> wrote: > > I strongly recommend including madlib, I find it very useful and convenient. > > Best regards > > Abhishek > > ________________________________ > From: Tushar Pednekar <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, April 3, 2025 7:13:16 AM > To: [email protected] <[email protected]> > Cc: Roman Shaposhnik <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: Interest in Incorporating Apache MADlib into Apache Cloudberry > (Incubating)? > > [You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is > important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ] > > Ed - IM(biased)O 😊 > > Wjat you propose seems appropriate - there are too many people who rely on > MADlib, mostly within existing Greenplum user base who would appreciate any > effort this community makes towards ease of life for the users. > > So, I would +1 for sure. > > Regards, > Tushar > > > ________________________________ > From: Ed Espino <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, April 3, 2025 7:15:37 PM > To: [email protected] <[email protected]> > Cc: Roman Shaposhnik <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: Interest in Incorporating Apache MADlib into Apache Cloudberry > (Incubating)? > > Hi all, > > Thanks for the thoughtful discussion and the feedback so far. > > While I understand that Dianjing’s conversations didn’t surface current > demand for Apache MADlib, I’d like to share a complementary perspective. > Shine and Tushar have both indicated that they have customers actively > using MADlib today. That signals that there’s still practical value in the > project, even if the broader community has quieted. > > Given this, I’d like to propose that we bring Apache MADlib under the > Apache Cloudberry (Incubating) umbrella as a trial integration. This would > give us 9–12 months to assess its relevance, community interest, and > technical fit within Cloudberry’s scope. If, at the end of that period, we > find limited engagement or adoption, we can responsibly sunset the > integration or initiate movement toward the Attic. > > I’m happy to take the lead on discussing this with the board, and I’m also > willing to initiate a PPMC vote if that’s the appropriate next step. Let me > know how you’d like to proceed. > > Thanks again for the open dialogue. > > Best regards, > -=e > > On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 1:56 AM Ed Espino <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi Apache Cloudberry (Incubating) Community, > > > > I wanted to reach out to gauge interest in incorporating Apache MADlib > > into the Apache Cloudberry (Incubating) project. > > > > As you may be aware, Broadcom has taken Greenplum closed source, > > effectively leaving Apache MADlib without a developer or user community to > > support it. Given this shift, we are exploring whether there is developer > > or user interest in bringing Apache MADlib into the Apache Cloudberry > > (Incubating) ecosystem. > > > > If there is interest, we’d be happy to discuss how this could align with > > Cloudberry’s mission and explore potential synergies. Otherwise, we may > > need to seek assistance in moving the Apache MADlib project into the Apache > > Attic due to the lack of active contributors and adoption. > > > > Would love to hear your thoughts on this! > > > > Best, > > -=e > > > > -- > > Ed Espino > > Apache Cloudberry (incubating) & MADlib > > > > > -- > Ed Espino > Apache Cloudberry (incubating) & MADlib --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
