Joseph: Of course, I understand it's out of date but I'm sure it worths a look!
Dan: You're right, it looks like Pylons is more suitable. Some pro's I see: - Mako seems to be a faster template engine than Django's one. - Looks to be really WSGI oriented from scratch. - As for the ORM, it just won't be suitable for Cassandra, ORMs nowadays are built obviously to work on the usual RDBMS... Now, I was just thinking, in terms of "objects" and "relational mapping", I'm guessing that "object mapping" is even easier in Cassandra than in a complex relational database. I had some nightmares working with DoctrineORM and PHP with largely normalized complex databases... On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 1:29 PM, Dan Di Spaltro <dan.dispal...@gmail.com> wrote: > I like Django. Its wide adoption, great docs and included batteries > make it an easy sell. > > But what your describing is more like a pylons, aka if you dont want > an orm in Pylons, don't include it. > > On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 8:49 AM, Matthew Dennis <mden...@merfer.net> wrote: >> +1 for pylons, I've been quite happy with it so far - lightweight, very >> flexible, loosely coupled components... >> >> On Apr 9, 2010, at 10:23 AM, Gary Dusbabek <gdusba...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I like pylons. Easy templating and relatively light weight. In my >>> experience, it was easier to get something working in pylons than >>> django, but I am impatient. >>> >>> Gary. >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 09:55, Pablo Cuadrado <pablocuadr...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi! >>>> >>>> I made a proposal about building a Cassandra Web UI. One of it's main >>>> components, will be Python on the server side. >>>> >>>> However, as Gary D. pointed out, it will be interesting to get your >>>> opinions on which framework to use. >>>> >>>> I suggested Django for being well-known and largely documented, but >>>> any other would do. >>>> >>>> As far as my experience goes on web development, this is what I -IMHO- >>>> think of any web framework, despite the language: >>>> >>>> - Really small footprint is a plus: "do we really need to include >>>> that, and that, and that other thing?" >>>> - Flexibility and freedom of code, another plus: "do I really need to >>>> inherit that class to do that" >>>> - Unneeded features tend to get in our way: like the "auto admin" >>>> panels of Django. Or the "FormAlchemy" and "SQLAlchemy" features in >>>> Pylons. >>>> - Templating features should be truly flexible, and do fast template >>>> parsing. >>>> >>>> Well, suggestions are needed! I would like to know your opinions on >>>> Django, Pylons, web2py, TurboGears, etc. >>>> >>>> Regards! >>>> >> > > > > -- > Dan Di Spaltro >