+1 for pylons, I've been quite happy with it so far - lightweight,
very flexible, loosely coupled components...
On Apr 9, 2010, at 10:23 AM, Gary Dusbabek <gdusba...@gmail.com> wrote:
I like pylons. Easy templating and relatively light weight. In my
experience, it was easier to get something working in pylons than
django, but I am impatient.
Gary.
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 09:55, Pablo Cuadrado
<pablocuadr...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi!
I made a proposal about building a Cassandra Web UI. One of it's main
components, will be Python on the server side.
However, as Gary D. pointed out, it will be interesting to get your
opinions on which framework to use.
I suggested Django for being well-known and largely documented, but
any other would do.
As far as my experience goes on web development, this is what I -
IMHO-
think of any web framework, despite the language:
- Really small footprint is a plus: "do we really need to include
that, and that, and that other thing?"
- Flexibility and freedom of code, another plus: "do I really need to
inherit that class to do that"
- Unneeded features tend to get in our way: like the "auto admin"
panels of Django. Or the "FormAlchemy" and "SQLAlchemy" features in
Pylons.
- Templating features should be truly flexible, and do fast
template parsing.
Well, suggestions are needed! I would like to know your opinions on
Django, Pylons, web2py, TurboGears, etc.
Regards!
