Way back when I wanted to try and use node.js and Cassandra, I started work
on a restful interface using Tornado and Lazyboy. I've since moved on from
that idea and the project is way out of date, but you can see what I had
done at this project on github - http://github.com/joerussbowman/jsondra

On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 11:49 AM, Matthew Dennis <mden...@merfer.net> wrote:

> +1 for pylons, I've been quite happy with it so far - lightweight, very
> flexible, loosely coupled components...
>
>
> On Apr 9, 2010, at 10:23 AM, Gary Dusbabek <gdusba...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>  I like pylons.  Easy templating and relatively light weight.  In my
>> experience, it was easier to get something working in pylons than
>> django, but I am impatient.
>>
>> Gary.
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 09:55, Pablo Cuadrado <pablocuadr...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> I made a proposal about building a Cassandra Web UI. One of it's main
>>> components, will be Python on the server side.
>>>
>>> However, as Gary D. pointed out, it will be interesting to get your
>>> opinions on which framework to use.
>>>
>>> I suggested Django for being well-known and largely documented, but
>>> any other would do.
>>>
>>> As far as my experience goes on web development, this is what I -IMHO-
>>> think of any web framework, despite the language:
>>>
>>> - Really small footprint is a plus: "do we really need to include
>>> that, and that, and that other thing?"
>>> - Flexibility and freedom of code, another plus: "do I really need to
>>> inherit that class to do that"
>>> - Unneeded features tend to get in our way: like the "auto admin"
>>> panels of Django. Or the "FormAlchemy" and "SQLAlchemy" features in
>>> Pylons.
>>> - Templating features should be truly flexible, and do fast template
>>> parsing.
>>>
>>> Well, suggestions are needed! I would like to know your opinions on
>>> Django, Pylons, web2py, TurboGears, etc.
>>>
>>> Regards!
>>>
>>>

Reply via email to