Shouldn't we have a vote before we start actually moving stuff? I'm going to start going through jira now, closing dead stuff, and adding labels for stuff that needs to be moved.
-Ivan On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 10:16 AM, Ivan Kelly <iv...@apache.org> wrote: > I'll do the first pass tomorrow. > > -Ivan > > On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 9:16 AM, Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com> wrote: >> That is awesome! +1 Thank you, Ivan. >> >> On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 11:22 PM, Ivan Kelly <iv...@apache.org> wrote: >> >>> btw, I'm volunteering to do this. >>> >>> -Ivan >>> >>> On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 8:21 AM, Ivan Kelly <iv...@apache.org> wrote: >>> > +1 >>> > >>> > The github flow is much nicer than the jira flow. I suggest we do a >>> > triage on the jira issues, closing stuff that will unlikely never be >>> > done. >>> > >>> > It would also be worthwhile for someone to triage the issues in github >>> > periodically, catagorizing, bumping priority, closing stale stuff, >>> > selecting issues for releases, etc. Otherwise it's just going to grow >>> > into something unmanageable again. >>> > >>> > -Ivan >>> > >>> > On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 5:21 AM, Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >> Yeah, >>> >> I would have sent this email this week... >>> >> I am totally +1 >>> >> Maybe we can look for some tool to move open JIRAs to GitHub >>> automatically >>> >> >>> >> Enrico >>> >> >>> >> 2017-10-05 5:20 GMT+02:00 Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com>: >>> >> >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> >>> >>> It has been more than 3 months after we moved to use Github for issue >>> >>> tracking (for BP-9 >>> >>> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/ >>> >>> BP-9+-+Github+issues+for+Issue+Tracking>). >>> >>> And we have been successfully released 4.5.0 when using Github. I >>> think it >>> >>> is the time to discuss to make JIRA readonly and all the activities >>> should >>> >>> happen in Github. >>> >>> >>> >>> Any thoughts? >>> >>> >>> >>> - Sijie >>> >>> >>>
