That is awesome! +1 Thank you, Ivan. On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 11:22 PM, Ivan Kelly <iv...@apache.org> wrote:
> btw, I'm volunteering to do this. > > -Ivan > > On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 8:21 AM, Ivan Kelly <iv...@apache.org> wrote: > > +1 > > > > The github flow is much nicer than the jira flow. I suggest we do a > > triage on the jira issues, closing stuff that will unlikely never be > > done. > > > > It would also be worthwhile for someone to triage the issues in github > > periodically, catagorizing, bumping priority, closing stale stuff, > > selecting issues for releases, etc. Otherwise it's just going to grow > > into something unmanageable again. > > > > -Ivan > > > > On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 5:21 AM, Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Yeah, > >> I would have sent this email this week... > >> I am totally +1 > >> Maybe we can look for some tool to move open JIRAs to GitHub > automatically > >> > >> Enrico > >> > >> 2017-10-05 5:20 GMT+02:00 Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com>: > >> > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> It has been more than 3 months after we moved to use Github for issue > >>> tracking (for BP-9 > >>> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/ > >>> BP-9+-+Github+issues+for+Issue+Tracking>). > >>> And we have been successfully released 4.5.0 when using Github. I > think it > >>> is the time to discuss to make JIRA readonly and all the activities > should > >>> happen in Github. > >>> > >>> Any thoughts? > >>> > >>> - Sijie > >>> >
