+1 On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 2:23 PM, Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thank you Ivan! > > Enrico > > > 2017-10-05 8:22 GMT+02:00 Ivan Kelly <iv...@apache.org>: > > > btw, I'm volunteering to do this. > > > > -Ivan > > > > On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 8:21 AM, Ivan Kelly <iv...@apache.org> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > > > The github flow is much nicer than the jira flow. I suggest we do a > > > triage on the jira issues, closing stuff that will unlikely never be > > > done. > > > > > > It would also be worthwhile for someone to triage the issues in github > > > periodically, catagorizing, bumping priority, closing stale stuff, > > > selecting issues for releases, etc. Otherwise it's just going to grow > > > into something unmanageable again. > > > > > > -Ivan > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 5:21 AM, Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > >> Yeah, > > >> I would have sent this email this week... > > >> I am totally +1 > > >> Maybe we can look for some tool to move open JIRAs to GitHub > > automatically > > >> > > >> Enrico > > >> > > >> 2017-10-05 5:20 GMT+02:00 Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com>: > > >> > > >>> Hi all, > > >>> > > >>> It has been more than 3 months after we moved to use Github for issue > > >>> tracking (for BP-9 > > >>> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/ > > >>> BP-9+-+Github+issues+for+Issue+Tracking>). > > >>> And we have been successfully released 4.5.0 when using Github. I > > think it > > >>> is the time to discuss to make JIRA readonly and all the activities > > should > > >>> happen in Github. > > >>> > > >>> Any thoughts? > > >>> > > >>> - Sijie > > >>> > > >
