btw, I'm volunteering to do this. -Ivan
On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 8:21 AM, Ivan Kelly <iv...@apache.org> wrote: > +1 > > The github flow is much nicer than the jira flow. I suggest we do a > triage on the jira issues, closing stuff that will unlikely never be > done. > > It would also be worthwhile for someone to triage the issues in github > periodically, catagorizing, bumping priority, closing stale stuff, > selecting issues for releases, etc. Otherwise it's just going to grow > into something unmanageable again. > > -Ivan > > On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 5:21 AM, Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Yeah, >> I would have sent this email this week... >> I am totally +1 >> Maybe we can look for some tool to move open JIRAs to GitHub automatically >> >> Enrico >> >> 2017-10-05 5:20 GMT+02:00 Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com>: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> It has been more than 3 months after we moved to use Github for issue >>> tracking (for BP-9 >>> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/ >>> BP-9+-+Github+issues+for+Issue+Tracking>). >>> And we have been successfully released 4.5.0 when using Github. I think it >>> is the time to discuss to make JIRA readonly and all the activities should >>> happen in Github. >>> >>> Any thoughts? >>> >>> - Sijie >>>
