[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-1008?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15963894#comment-15963894
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on BOOKKEEPER-1008:
--------------------------------------------
Github user kishorekasi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/116
Enrico,
I have updated the pull request with my local changes.
Kishore
> On Apr 10, 2017, at 5:42 AM, Enrico Olivelli <[email protected]>
wrote:
>
> @kishorekasi could you push your current local version so that me and
@revans2 can help you with failing tests ?
>
> —
> You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
>
> Move to netty4
> --------------
>
> Key: BOOKKEEPER-1008
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-1008
> Project: Bookkeeper
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: bookkeeper-client, bookkeeper-server
> Affects Versions: 4.5.0
> Reporter: Robert Joseph Evans
> Assignee: Robert Joseph Evans
>
> As part of the Yahoo push back and in general we would like to move to netty
> 4, preferably netty 4.1.x for the client and server communication.
> This lays the ground work for zero copy, or very nearly zero copy handling on
> the server side.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
