[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-1008?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15924052#comment-15924052
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on BOOKKEEPER-1008:
--------------------------------------------
Github user eolivelli commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/116
I have starting lloking at the PR
first comments on new dependencies:
- netty-tcnative-1.1.33.Fork25.pom -> there is a 2.0.0.Final version, what
do you think ? (https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/io.netty/netty-tcnative)
- use of os-maven-plugin +
netty-tcnative-boringssl-static-1.1.33.Fork25-linux-x86_64.jar -> I think it
would be better to include only a specific version, the build depends on the OS
which is running the build so IMHO it is not reproducible (I have Fedora for
instance)
- OK for "boringssl-static" other versions are very OS dependant
@revans2 which version of the native libs are you using ?
> Move to netty4
> --------------
>
> Key: BOOKKEEPER-1008
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-1008
> Project: Bookkeeper
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: bookkeeper-client, bookkeeper-server
> Affects Versions: 4.5.0
> Reporter: Robert Joseph Evans
> Assignee: Robert Joseph Evans
>
> As part of the Yahoo push back and in general we would like to move to netty
> 4, preferably netty 4.1.x for the client and server communication.
> This lays the ground work for zero copy, or very nearly zero copy handling on
> the server side.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
