[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-1008?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15937614#comment-15937614
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on BOOKKEEPER-1008:
--------------------------------------------

Github user kishorekasi commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/116
  
    I am currently little busy with another priority at work and haven't spent
    time on this in the past week. I hope to get back to this soon.
    
    Kishore
    
    On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 7:52 PM, Sijie Guo <notificati...@github.com> wrote:
    
    > *@sijie* commented on this pull request.
    > ------------------------------
    >
    > In bookkeeper-server/src/main/java/org/apache/bookkeeper/
    > client/BookKeeper.java
    > <https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/116#discussion_r107578730>:
    >
    > > @@ -225,10 +233,10 @@ private static ZooKeeper 
validateZooKeeper(ZooKeeper zk) throws NullPointerExcep
    >          return zk;
    >      }
    >
    > -    private static ClientSocketChannelFactory 
validateChannelFactory(ClientSocketChannelFactory factory)
    > +    private static EventLoopGroup validateChannelFactory(EventLoopGroup 
eventLoopGroup)
    >
    > +1 on this comment. we should rename it.
    >
    > —
    > You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
    > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
    > <https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/116#discussion_r107578730>, or 
mute
    > the thread
    > 
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADKY-FXN33zwvxDmGD7qUF66sfcNbMFRks5rod6KgaJpZM4McUUZ>
    > .
    >



> Move to netty4
> --------------
>
>                 Key: BOOKKEEPER-1008
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-1008
>             Project: Bookkeeper
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: bookkeeper-client, bookkeeper-server
>    Affects Versions: 4.5.0
>            Reporter: Robert Joseph Evans
>            Assignee: Robert Joseph Evans
>
> As part of the Yahoo push back and in general we would like to move to netty 
> 4, preferably netty 4.1.x for the client and server communication.
> This lays the ground work for zero copy, or very nearly zero copy handling on 
> the server side.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Reply via email to