@pitrou I've updated the format PR to add the Experimental tag to the header and the documentation. Thanks!
On Fri, Oct 25, 2024, 7:35 AM Antoine Pitrou <anto...@python.org> wrote: > > +1, with the same comments as Felipe and Dewey. > > Just at one condition from me: the API should be marked experimental. > > Regards > > Antoine. > > > Le 24/10/2024 à 23:17, Felipe Oliveira Carvalho a écrit : > > +1 from me. > > > > I reviewed the PR some time ago and it's not a trivial protocol, but the > > complexity seems warranted and necessary. > > > > On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 6:02 PM Dewey Dunnington > > <de...@voltrondata.com.invalid> wrote: > > > >> Thanks Matt for putting this together! > >> > >> I was initially concerned about the complexity of the proposal; > >> however, it is a difficult interaction to standardize and this > >> proposal is not so complex that it is unimplementable. I am excited to > >> use this to improve our asynchronous database access story in the R > >> ADBC bindings. > >> > >> +1 from me! > >> > >> -dewey > >> > >> On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 1:28 PM Matt Topol <zotthewiz...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >>> > >>> Hey All, > >>> > >>> I would like to propose a vote for us to officially add and adopt Async > >>> structures for the Arrow C Data Interface. The proposal can be found, > >> along > >>> with discussion in comment threads, at [1]. The proposal contains the > >>> definitions and additions to the documentation for the website. > >>> > >>> As is required, there are two implementations filed as PRs, a C++ > >>> implementation [2] and a Go implementation [3]. > >>> > >>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > >>> > >>> [ ] +1 Accept the proposal > >>> [ ] +0 > >>> [ ] -1 Do not accept this proposal because... > >>> > >>> Thanks everyone! > >>> --Matt > >>> > >>> [1]: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/43632 > >>> [2]: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/44495 > >>> [3]: https://github.com/apache/arrow-go/pull/169 > >> > > >
