+1 from me. I reviewed the PR some time ago and it's not a trivial protocol, but the complexity seems warranted and necessary.
On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 6:02 PM Dewey Dunnington <de...@voltrondata.com.invalid> wrote: > Thanks Matt for putting this together! > > I was initially concerned about the complexity of the proposal; > however, it is a difficult interaction to standardize and this > proposal is not so complex that it is unimplementable. I am excited to > use this to improve our asynchronous database access story in the R > ADBC bindings. > > +1 from me! > > -dewey > > On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 1:28 PM Matt Topol <zotthewiz...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hey All, > > > > I would like to propose a vote for us to officially add and adopt Async > > structures for the Arrow C Data Interface. The proposal can be found, > along > > with discussion in comment threads, at [1]. The proposal contains the > > definitions and additions to the documentation for the website. > > > > As is required, there are two implementations filed as PRs, a C++ > > implementation [2] and a Go implementation [3]. > > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > > > > [ ] +1 Accept the proposal > > [ ] +0 > > [ ] -1 Do not accept this proposal because... > > > > Thanks everyone! > > --Matt > > > > [1]: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/43632 > > [2]: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/44495 > > [3]: https://github.com/apache/arrow-go/pull/169 >
