Thanks Matt for putting this together!

I was initially concerned about the complexity of the proposal;
however, it is a difficult interaction to standardize and this
proposal is not so complex that it is unimplementable. I am excited to
use this to improve our asynchronous database access story in the R
ADBC bindings.

+1 from me!

-dewey

On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 1:28 PM Matt Topol <zotthewiz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hey All,
>
> I would like to propose a vote for us to officially add and adopt Async
> structures for the Arrow C Data Interface. The proposal can be found, along
> with discussion in comment threads, at [1]. The proposal contains the
> definitions and additions to the documentation for the website.
>
> As is required, there are two implementations filed as PRs, a C++
> implementation [2] and a Go implementation [3].
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 Accept the proposal
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1 Do not accept this proposal because...
>
> Thanks everyone!
> --Matt
>
> [1]: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/43632
> [2]: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/44495
> [3]: https://github.com/apache/arrow-go/pull/169

Reply via email to