+1, with the same comments as Felipe and Dewey.
Just at one condition from me: the API should be marked experimental.
Regards
Antoine.
Le 24/10/2024 à 23:17, Felipe Oliveira Carvalho a écrit :
+1 from me.
I reviewed the PR some time ago and it's not a trivial protocol, but the
complexity seems warranted and necessary.
On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 6:02 PM Dewey Dunnington
<de...@voltrondata.com.invalid> wrote:
Thanks Matt for putting this together!
I was initially concerned about the complexity of the proposal;
however, it is a difficult interaction to standardize and this
proposal is not so complex that it is unimplementable. I am excited to
use this to improve our asynchronous database access story in the R
ADBC bindings.
+1 from me!
-dewey
On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 1:28 PM Matt Topol <zotthewiz...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hey All,
I would like to propose a vote for us to officially add and adopt Async
structures for the Arrow C Data Interface. The proposal can be found,
along
with discussion in comment threads, at [1]. The proposal contains the
definitions and additions to the documentation for the website.
As is required, there are two implementations filed as PRs, a C++
implementation [2] and a Go implementation [3].
The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
[ ] +1 Accept the proposal
[ ] +0
[ ] -1 Do not accept this proposal because...
Thanks everyone!
--Matt
[1]: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/43632
[2]: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/44495
[3]: https://github.com/apache/arrow-go/pull/169
