I'm happy to start a new thread to focus on DoPut specifically. Middleware for Java has been in review.
Best, David On 9/9/19, Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ah, I think I'm referring to the format change around DoPut, for which > there is not a PR yet. Sorry for my confusion > > Do we want to start a separate discussion thread about that? > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1hrwxNwPU1aOD_1ciRUOaGeUCyXYOmu6IxxCfY6Stj6w/edit?usp=sharing > > On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 3:51 PM Antoine Pitrou <anto...@python.org> wrote: >> >> >> Isn't a middleware an implementation-specific concern? Does it need a >> formal vote? >> >> Regards >> >> Antoine. >> >> >> Le 09/09/2019 à 22:49, Wes McKinney a écrit : >> > It seems like there is positive feedback on the PR. Do we want to have >> > a vote about this? >> > >> > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 7:54 AM David Li <li.david...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> I've (finally) put up a draft implementation of middleware for Java: >> >> https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/5068 >> >> >> >> Hopefully this helps clarify how the proposal works. >> >> >> >> Best, >> >> David >> >> >> >> On 7/25/19, David Li <li.david...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Thanks for the feedback, Antoine. That would be a natural method to >> >>> have - then the server could deny uploads (as you mention) or note >> >>> that the stream already exists. I've updated the proposal to reflect >> >>> that, leaving more detailed semantics (e.g. append vs overwrite) >> >>> application-defined. >> >>> >> >>> Best, >> >>> David >> >>> >> >>> On 7/25/19, Antoine Pitrou <anto...@python.org> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>> Le 08/07/2019 à 16:33, David Li a écrit : >> >>>>> Hi all, >> >>>>> >> >>>>> I've put together two more proposals for Flight, motivated by >> >>>>> projects >> >>>>> we've been working on. I'd appreciate any comments on the >> >>>>> design/reasoning; I'm already working on the implementation, >> >>>>> alongside >> >>>>> some other improvements to Flight. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> The first is to modify the DoPut call to follow the same request >> >>>>> pattern as DoGet. This is a format change and would require a vote. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1hrwxNwPU1aOD_1ciRUOaGeUCyXYOmu6IxxCfY6Stj6w/edit?usp=sharing >> >>>> >> >>>> It seems it would be useful to introduce a GetPutInfo (or >> >>>> GetUploadInfo) >> >>>> so as to allow differential behaviour between getting and putting. >> >>>> >> >>>> (one trivial case would be to disallow uploading altogether :-))) >> >>>> >> >>>> Regards >> >>>> >> >>>> Antoine. >> >>>> >> >>> >
