It seems like there is positive feedback on the PR. Do we want to have a vote about this?
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 7:54 AM David Li <li.david...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I've (finally) put up a draft implementation of middleware for Java: > https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/5068 > > Hopefully this helps clarify how the proposal works. > > Best, > David > > On 7/25/19, David Li <li.david...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Thanks for the feedback, Antoine. That would be a natural method to > > have - then the server could deny uploads (as you mention) or note > > that the stream already exists. I've updated the proposal to reflect > > that, leaving more detailed semantics (e.g. append vs overwrite) > > application-defined. > > > > Best, > > David > > > > On 7/25/19, Antoine Pitrou <anto...@python.org> wrote: > >> > >> Le 08/07/2019 à 16:33, David Li a écrit : > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> I've put together two more proposals for Flight, motivated by projects > >>> we've been working on. I'd appreciate any comments on the > >>> design/reasoning; I'm already working on the implementation, alongside > >>> some other improvements to Flight. > >>> > >>> The first is to modify the DoPut call to follow the same request > >>> pattern as DoGet. This is a format change and would require a vote. > >>> > >>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1hrwxNwPU1aOD_1ciRUOaGeUCyXYOmu6IxxCfY6Stj6w/edit?usp=sharing > >> > >> It seems it would be useful to introduce a GetPutInfo (or GetUploadInfo) > >> so as to allow differential behaviour between getting and putting. > >> > >> (one trivial case would be to disallow uploading altogether :-))) > >> > >> Regards > >> > >> Antoine. > >> > >
