How do you unsubscribe from these emails?

On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 10:00 AM Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com> wrote:

> hi David,
>
> On the DoPut change, I am potentially in favor of making a change to
> support the use case you are describing. In principle, the CMD field
> of FlightDescriptor could be used to transmit application-defined
> information with a Put request. Though I suspect that a DoAction to
> "prepare" the server for a DoPut would be more common in production
> servers. I'm interested in Jacques's or others' thoughts about this
>
> On the middleware API I am in favor; there are obviously a lot details
> that have to be worked out, but it's important that Flight servers and
> clients are able to be instrumented to collect metrics in a production
> setting.
>
> Thanks,
> Wes
>
> On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 9:33 AM David Li <li.david...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I've put together two more proposals for Flight, motivated by projects
> > we've been working on. I'd appreciate any comments on the
> > design/reasoning; I'm already working on the implementation, alongside
> > some other improvements to Flight.
> >
> > The first is to modify the DoPut call to follow the same request
> > pattern as DoGet. This is a format change and would require a vote.
> >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1hrwxNwPU1aOD_1ciRUOaGeUCyXYOmu6IxxCfY6Stj6w/edit?usp=sharing
> >
> > ---
> >
> > The second is to introduce a middleware API for Flight, to make
> > integration with logging and tracing frameworks (e.g. OpenTracing)
> > easier:
> >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Nm1ASp6w5PZQX42KkOTLK5LvrOv5q2cCbkaiVjqKjLU/edit?usp=sharing
> >
> > As part of this, I'm working on APIs to send richer error
> > codes/messages between Flight clients/servers, now that @Micah has
> > enabled custom error codes in Arrow-C++. These are API changes and
> > should not require a vote, I believe.
> >
> > ---
> >
> > Anyone should have comment access to these documents, but let me know if
> not.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Best,
> > David
>

Reply via email to