Ah, I think I'm referring to the format change around DoPut, for which there is not a PR yet. Sorry for my confusion
Do we want to start a separate discussion thread about that? https://docs.google.com/document/d/1hrwxNwPU1aOD_1ciRUOaGeUCyXYOmu6IxxCfY6Stj6w/edit?usp=sharing On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 3:51 PM Antoine Pitrou <anto...@python.org> wrote: > > > Isn't a middleware an implementation-specific concern? Does it need a > formal vote? > > Regards > > Antoine. > > > Le 09/09/2019 à 22:49, Wes McKinney a écrit : > > It seems like there is positive feedback on the PR. Do we want to have > > a vote about this? > > > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 7:54 AM David Li <li.david...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> I've (finally) put up a draft implementation of middleware for Java: > >> https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/5068 > >> > >> Hopefully this helps clarify how the proposal works. > >> > >> Best, > >> David > >> > >> On 7/25/19, David Li <li.david...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> Thanks for the feedback, Antoine. That would be a natural method to > >>> have - then the server could deny uploads (as you mention) or note > >>> that the stream already exists. I've updated the proposal to reflect > >>> that, leaving more detailed semantics (e.g. append vs overwrite) > >>> application-defined. > >>> > >>> Best, > >>> David > >>> > >>> On 7/25/19, Antoine Pitrou <anto...@python.org> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Le 08/07/2019 à 16:33, David Li a écrit : > >>>>> Hi all, > >>>>> > >>>>> I've put together two more proposals for Flight, motivated by projects > >>>>> we've been working on. I'd appreciate any comments on the > >>>>> design/reasoning; I'm already working on the implementation, alongside > >>>>> some other improvements to Flight. > >>>>> > >>>>> The first is to modify the DoPut call to follow the same request > >>>>> pattern as DoGet. This is a format change and would require a vote. > >>>>> > >>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1hrwxNwPU1aOD_1ciRUOaGeUCyXYOmu6IxxCfY6Stj6w/edit?usp=sharing > >>>> > >>>> It seems it would be useful to introduce a GetPutInfo (or GetUploadInfo) > >>>> so as to allow differential behaviour between getting and putting. > >>>> > >>>> (one trivial case would be to disallow uploading altogether :-))) > >>>> > >>>> Regards > >>>> > >>>> Antoine. > >>>> > >>>
