> Wearing my Gump hat, this sounds really bad. If we introduce a new > feature in Ant we use Gump to testdrive it for backwards > compatibility. Having known bugs inside the test drive doesn't seem a > good idea to me.
sounds like a feature request for gump: automatically merge the branch and fail if there are conflicts, then fall back to just using HEAD. (of course, it does not commit the merger, just does the cvs update -j ... -j ... bit). Would be an interesting experiment to see how often it blows up :) Cheers, Brett --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
