What is the criteria that is use by the Ant project for a major, minor, and micro version bump?
Stephen. > -----Original Message----- > From: Antoine Levy-Lambert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 23 August 2004 22:02 > To: Ant Developers List > Subject: Ant 1.6.3 [was status report on the PMC list] > > FYI > > On Mon, 23 Aug 2004, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > > >>On Mon, 23 Aug 2004, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: > >> > >>> It sounds like we need to discuss whether we want an ant 1.6.3 or > >>> go directly to ant 1.7.0. > >> > >> We could call the HEAD 1.6.3. > >> > >> There is currently IMO not enough changes in CVS HEAD to warrent an > >> .1 change. > > >I agree with Peter. Between 1.4 and 1.5 we didn't have that long > >lived branch and so accumulated a lot of stuff to warrant a new .1, > >and shortly after we released 1.5 the HEAD became quite different from > >the last release. Neither of both has happened to HEAD yet AFAIK. > > >No need to keep this discussion on the PMC list, BTW (even if I won't > >read the dev list for the next two weeks ;-) > > >Stefan > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
