On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 11:27 AM, Byron Jones <g...@mozilla.com> wrote:
> But indeed having also the patches in bugzilla would be good. >> > no, it would be bad for patches to be duplicated into bugzilla. we're > moving from bugzilla/mozreview to phabricator for code review, duplicating > phabricate reviews back into the old systems seems like a step backwards > (and i'm not even sure what the value is of doing so). > I find this a strange argument. We don't know how successful phrabricator is going to be. The last attempt to switch review tools seems to be getting killed. I think its somewhat reasonable to be skeptical of further review tool changes. Also, I have to say the whole phabricator thing has been kind of presented as a fait accompli. As someone who continues to use splinter on a daily basis I'm 1) skeptical and 2) kind of unhappy. Maybe phabricator will be great, but I'll believe it when I see it. Please don't force future data and workflow into an as-yet unproven tool. Thanks. Ben _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
