Agreed with that. We should expand the search including crash keyword so that we can triage those issues no matter it’s a regression or high-volume crash.
—-- Best Regards, Astley Chen | Mozilla Taiwan On 20 Dec 2016, at 2:00 PM, Kan-Ru Chen <kc...@mozilla.com> wrote: On Thu, Dec 15, 2016, at 11:17 AM, Ryan VanderMeulen wrote: > I like the idea in principle, but in practice, two meetings a week is > already not enough to get through regression bugs. Are we going to add > more meetings to accommodate this? And I'll note that already, > attendance of the regular regression triage meetings has declined from > where it was a month or two ago. I think the most important is to identify whether the crash bugs are regressions so they can be tracked accordingly. We have a third triage meeting in Asia friendly timezone; I think we can try to go over the list of crash bugs and put correct flags in the meeting. Kanru > Also, I thought one of the roles of the Uptime team was to triage crash > bugs. Is that not actually the case? > > -Ryan > > On 12/14/2016 9:42 PM, Jet Villegas wrote: >> +1 on expanding the search. That should help get earlier diagnosis. We >> should also add 'regression' to those bugs as part of triage, as >> appropriate. >> >> --Jet > > _______________________________________________ > dev-platform mailing list > dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org <mailto:dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform <https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform> _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
