I thought this was already asked and answered, but just to be clear. We are not going to make any changes to the ESR schedule or make Firefox 48 any kind of long-term release. The development costs of maintaining another branch are high, and not something we're willing to pay.
--BDS On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 7:35 PM, Xidorn Quan <quanxunz...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 2:19 AM, Lawrence Mandel <lman...@mozilla.com> > wrote: > > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 12:11 PM, Henrik Skupin <m...@hskupin.info> > wrote: > > > > > Mike Hommey wrote on 05/11/2016 05:06 AM: > > > >> The post states "Mozilla will end support for Firefox on OS X 10.6, > > > 10.7, > > > >> and 10.8 in August, 2016." This means that we will end support with > > the > > > >> Firefox 48 release. i.e. Firefox 48 will not support OS X 10.6-10.8. > > > > > > > > That's why the post should have given a version number instead of an > > > > ambiguous date. > > > > > > Bug 1269790 only landed on mozilla-central. Shouldn't it then also be > > > backported to mozilla-aurora so it will hit the 48.0 release? > > > > > > > Given the confusion, we will drop support in 49.0. > > > Can we now make 48.0 a half-ESR? Firefox 49.0 starts to drop 10.6~10.8 as > well as machines which do not support SSE. Given we are still support them > with 45ESR, I think it makes sense to extend the support cycle of 48 to the > end of cycle of 45ESR. > > - Xidorn > _______________________________________________ > dev-platform mailing list > dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform > _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
