On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 8:16 AM, L. David Baron <dba...@dbaron.org> wrote: > On Tuesday 2015-09-08 23:25 -0700, Jonas Sicking wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 5:33 PM, Tantek Çelik <tan...@cs.stanford.edu> wrote: >> > On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 3:16 AM, Henri Sivonen <hsivo...@hsivonen.fi> >> > wrote: >> >> On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 9:59 PM, L. David Baron <dba...@dbaron.org> wrote: >> >> > The W3C is proposing revised charters for: >> >> > >> >> > Web Platform Working Group: >> >> > http://www.w3.org/2015/07/web-platform-wg.html >> >> > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2015Jul/0020.html >> > >> > >> > tl;dr I think we should vote to approve these charters with changes >> > requested (but not required), based on the input in this thread to date. >> >> I absolutely think that we should only vote to approve these charters >> if they remove merging the WebApps and HTML WGs. >> >> I agree that licenses are important. But I think having a working WG >> is even more important. > > So part of the reason it's hard to justify having a separate HTML WG > right now is that there's really not very much in HTML that there's > active interest in working on. If we want to argue for having a > separate HTML WG, I think we need a proposal (with consensus from > other implementors) on things that working group should work on that > are priorities for us to implement. And I really don't think that > set of things exists.
I guess I don't have an opinion about what to do with the HTML WG. But I don't think that lack of interest in a HTML WG is a reason to change the WebApps WG. Let me put it this way, how would you feel about integrating the HTML WG into the W3C Style WG? After all, one of the big problems with HTML lately has been adding HTML features that can't be styled by authors. / Jonas _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
