On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 5:49 AM, L. David Baron <dba...@dbaron.org> wrote: > I guess I have mixed feelings about that. It's advantageous to have > WHATWG specifications published under the W3C patent policy by this > working group, though that doesn't require technical work happening > in W3C.
For most specifications all we got was significant developer confusion and no coverage. Why would this group be different? > It's also good to have Microsoft's participation, and that > does require technical work. In my experience I get about the same amount of feedback from Microsoft. Not much, but not nothing either. On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 5:51 AM, L. David Baron <dba...@dbaron.org> wrote: > On Monday 2015-08-10 12:27 +0200, Anne van Kesteren wrote: >> We should probably also voice opposition to HTML Imports in its >> current form. > > What's the rationale for opposing it? We've stated that we don't want to implement it: https://hacks.mozilla.org/2014/12/mozilla-and-web-components/ -- https://annevankesteren.nl/ _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
