Am Samstag, 28. Juni 2014 18:39:12 UTC+2 schrieb David Rajchenbach-Teller:
> I don't follow what you have in mind. Assuming that you suggest we move
> to sqlite, you seem to be suggesting that we should considerably
> increase the amount of I/O. Or do I misunderstand what you say?

At first it was just a comment to the bug you mentioned ... about "Journaled 
Storage" ... and the example there with bookmarks backup ... and that I don't 
think that this is necessary for this ...
So if we have to first to talk about a other storage solution ... about a 
"Journaled Storage" ... we have to talk maybe first for what it is needed ... 
if really for a backup of the bookmarks/places ... ???
Other topic for that ???

And if the SQLite writes just the changing tab(s), it should be less I/O then 
writing all the time the complete JSON, or ???
_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Reply via email to