Am Samstag, 28. Juni 2014 18:39:12 UTC+2 schrieb David Rajchenbach-Teller: > I don't follow what you have in mind. Assuming that you suggest we move > to sqlite, you seem to be suggesting that we should considerably > increase the amount of I/O. Or do I misunderstand what you say?
At first it was just a comment to the bug you mentioned ... about "Journaled Storage" ... and the example there with bookmarks backup ... and that I don't think that this is necessary for this ... So if we have to first to talk about a other storage solution ... about a "Journaled Storage" ... we have to talk maybe first for what it is needed ... if really for a backup of the bookmarks/places ... ??? Other topic for that ??? And if the SQLite writes just the changing tab(s), it should be less I/O then writing all the time the complete JSON, or ??? _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform