Am Samstag, 28. Juni 2014 14:23:32 UTC+2 schrieb Tim Taubert: > Tobias Besemer wrote: > > > The ss is necessary, when e.g. a user editing a large text in a wiki, > > haven't saved that text yet, and closes this page as a mistake. So he can > > go back / undo close and still have his un-saved text ... > > > > Yes, this was the reason why sessionstore was introduced years ago. > > Today sessionstore provides much more than just crash recovery and a lot > > of people rely on it. > > > > > IMHO this scenario is so unlikely, that is makes no scene, to keep a lot of > > data in the ss for each user by a manual close with the default settings. > > > > You are evading my questions and still haven't answered why the amount > > of I/O you say you're seeing is a problem for you. Instead of > > re-iterating your proposal and what you think we should be doing it > > would be great if you could tell us why the current behavior is a > > problem for you. > > > > - Tim
I have answered you questions. It would be nice if you try to help to document this things ss do, what are ATM not still documented. _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
