On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 5:23 PM, Ehsan Akhgari <ehsan.akhg...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2014-04-28, 10:17 AM, Henri Sivonen wrote: >> >> On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 4:36 PM, Ehsan Akhgari <ehsan.akhg...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> On 2014-04-28, 8:59 AM, Henri Sivonen wrote: >>>> New question: >>>> >>>> We have various scriptable nsIFoo stuff (e.g. nsIParserService, >>>> nsIScriptableUConv) on the fringes of Gecko for use by mailnews, the >>>> Firefox UI or extensions. Since Gaia doesn't use XPCOM, those things >>>> are dead code in B2G, right? Would it make sense to invest time in >>>> #ifdefing them out for B2G? Or are they already left out by some >>>> mechanism not obvious to me? >>> >>> No, there is no such mechanism. We should turn these off where we can. >> >> OK. Is >> if CONFIG['MOZ_WIDGET_TOOLKIT'] != 'gonk': >> the right check to use in moz.build? > > Depends on what you mean. That check would be true for b2g desktop for > example, since it doesn't use gonk. If you want to turn something off for > b2g entirely, use CONFIG['MOZ_B2G'].
Thanks. I filed https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1003028 . When attempting to file dependencies, I discovered that some cruft that I thought could be turned off for B2G is used more broadly than I thought, because previously I was looking at C++ callers forgetting that so .jsm files in m-c are still B2G-relevant. Is there an easy way to see what JS code in mozilla-central is used by B2G? -- Henri Sivonen hsivo...@hsivonen.fi https://hsivonen.fi/ _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
