On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 9:13 PM, Trevor Saunders <trev.saund...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 12:08:52PM -0400, Ehsan Akhgari wrote: >> On 2014-06-03, 5:57 AM, Henri Sivonen wrote: >> >On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 5:45 PM, Nathan Froyd <froy...@mozilla.com> wrote: >> >>Assuming that ICU is already compiled with the moral equivalent of GCC's >> >>-ffunction-sections -fdata-sections or MSVC's /Gy, then statically linking >> >>ICU into libxul should already strip out all the un-needed ICU bits (when >> >>using the appropriate linker option). >> > >> >Disabling ICU IDNA code made libxul smaller, so it seems practice >> >doesn't match the above theory. (I.e. clearly the linker wasn't >> >automatically dropping ICU IDNA code.) > > Well, was this tested in a local build, or ones done in automation?
Tested with tryserver builds. -- Henri Sivonen hsivo...@hsivonen.fi https://hsivonen.fi/ _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
