I think the best way to expend energy on this topic would be to work on
tools.
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=875605 seems worth getting
over the line. Some other kind of checker, possibly based on clang-format,
could also be a fine alternative. Just get something working that is
convenient for developers and reviewers with few false positives, so I can
trivially bounce any style-erroneous patches back to the author and not
have to see obvious style issues during review.

Rob
-- 
Jtehsauts  tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy  Mdaon  yhoaus  eanuttehrotraiitny  eovni
le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o  Whhei csha iids  teoa
stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d  'mYaonu,r  "sGients  uapr,e  tfaokreg iyvoeunr,
'm aotr  atnod  sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t"  uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n?  gBoutt  uIp
waanndt  wyeonut  thoo mken.o w
_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Reply via email to