I think the best way to expend energy on this topic would be to work on tools.
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=875605 seems worth getting over the line. Some other kind of checker, possibly based on clang-format, could also be a fine alternative. Just get something working that is convenient for developers and reviewers with few false positives, so I can trivially bounce any style-erroneous patches back to the author and not have to see obvious style issues during review. Rob -- Jtehsauts tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy Mdaon yhoaus eanuttehrotraiitny eovni le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o Whhei csha iids teoa stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d 'mYaonu,r "sGients uapr,e tfaokreg iyvoeunr, 'm aotr atnod sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t" uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n? gBoutt uIp waanndt wyeonut thoo mken.o w _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
