On 2013-09-10 12:09 PM, ishikawa wrote:
> On (2013年09月10日 00:08), Scott Johnson wrote:
>>
>> Thus Spoke ishikawa:
>>>
>>> I wonder if trying to re-indent legacy code according to the current style
>>> is a good idea or not. (It is a little irritating to modify a part of legacy
>>> code and find my editor trying to follow the current style while the rest of
>>> the file is in different style.)
>> I'd recommend we not do this, as it will likely break hg blame. I've
>> worked for companies in the past that checked in formatting changes
>> alongside other, functional changes, and it ended (even in small
>> codebases) in a lot of chaos - mostly that it was a) difficult to review
>> those changes and b) difficult to track back which
>> bugs/tickets/developers changed which sets of code.
>>
>> If we were going to do this, though, we should have a separate bug for
>> formatting changes, and check in those changes in separate patches
>> (maybe even one per file whose formatting is to be changed).
>>
>> ~Scott
> 
> So you are suggesting something like
> step 1 - request for formatting a file indented in an arcane format, i.e.,
> reformat it according to the currently adopted code.
> step 2 - then after the re-formating of the file is done,
>     particular bug or something is fixed in the newly formatted code.
> 
> I understand the merit of leaving the code as is since hg blame won't work
> nicely with such file-wide format change as in step-1.
> (Or maybe we can teach hg blame to ignore such change, etc. but maybe too
> much work: the idea would be to mark formatting change with a particular
> string [maybe tag name] and let hg blame  to ignore such tag to look for a
> previous patch that touched each line. Hmm. Maybe too much work indeed)

There is hg blame -w (and git blame -w) which ignores whitespace
changes, but that's slower, and also hgweb (and I think gitweb) don't
support it.

Cheers,
Ehsan

_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Reply via email to