On Sam, 2003-02-08 at 23:57, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 03:33:07PM +0100, Michel D?nzer scrawled:
> > On Sam, 2003-02-08 at 01:17, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > > On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 01:04:18AM +0100, Michel D?nzer scrawled:
> > > > Duh, gcc obviously needs _its own_ version in the package name. I was
> > > > talking about xserver3.2-xfree86 (built with gcc 3.2), xlibs2.3.1 (built
> > > > against glibc 2.3.1), ... because those version numbers are about as
> > > > relevant to those packages as the Mesa version number is to xlibmesa.
> > > 
> > > I agree entirely with Branden: if the changes are irrelevant, why does
> > > upstream keep bumping the *major* revision number?
> > 
> > I suspect Marcelo could explain this far better than I can, but I'm not
> > sure he's reading this, so I'll try once again:
> > 
> > The Mesa version number reflects the progress of the Mesa project. The
> > purpose of the Mesa project (and the xlibmesa packages) is to provide an
> > implementation of the OpenGL specification. Neither the API nor the ABI
> > of the libGL provided by Mesa has changed since Mesa version 3.x at
> > least.
> 
> Right, however giving xlibmesa a version number that only relates to
> XFree86, and not to Mesa at all, would be pretty misleading, because
> they'd see xlibmesa-gl, with a version of 4.2.1-5, and say "Oh, that
> must be Mesa version 4!".
> 
> Bzzt.

A broken package name to compensate for broken assumptions? Right. Give
it the Mesa version then, or document it in the description, or
wherever.


> > PS: Will you please fix the xlibmesa4-drm-src package at least? As I've
> > told you before, the name is broken because the DRM has nothing to do
> > with Mesa, and DRI stands for Direct Rendering _Infrastructure_.
> 
> How did DRI ever come into this? I'll rename it to something less
> broken, I agree, but I don't see how the acronym for DRI comes into
> this.

Read your description, and note my emphasis?


-- 
Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper)/ Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc) developer
XFree86 and DRI project member   /  CS student, Free Software enthusiast

Reply via email to