On Don, 2003-02-06 at 17:47, Branden Robinson wrote: > On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 05:14:57PM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote: > > On Don, 2003-02-06 at 16:28, Branden Robinson wrote: > > > I'm not dodging it at all. xlibmesa3 is called xlibmesa3 because: > > > > > > 1) it's XFree86's version of the Mesa libraries (hence the "x"); > > > 2) it's the Mesa library (hence the "libmesa"); and > > > > Noone is arguing that. > > > > > 3) it's version 3.x of the Mesa library (hence the "3"). > > > > You dodged my vital question again: > > > > 'How is the major Mesa version number relevant for the xlibmesa package > > name?' > > How is a major version number relevant for anything? For example, how > is it relevant for XFree86?
It isn't, hence no other packages built from the xfree86 source package bear a version number in their name. What's your point? -- Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper)/ Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc) developer XFree86 and DRI project member / CS student, Free Software enthusiast
