On Wed, 2002-07-24 at 20:39, Jeff Lessem wrote: > "Charl P. Botha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I had a look at your X output and all seems fine. How many FPS does > > glxgears yield? You have to run it for at least 5 seconds before it outputs > > something to stdout. > > glxgears, in its default small size is about 500 fps, expanding the > window to full screen gets me 25 fps. Xscreensaver's gears hack gets > about 5 fps running full screen.
The size of the latter's window doesn't seem to impact the framerate here, so that sounds like software rendering. > On the advice of Michel Dänzer (thanks!) I added the debian dri-trunk > stuff, and got that working easily enough with the 1.4.0 20020714 > Radeon drm driver, but it didn't make any difference. Everything > appears to be working correctly, but gl stuff is very slow. The only > error I get is [drm:radeon_freelist_get] *ERROR* returning NULL! > output from the drm driver. That on the other hand only appears with direct rendering... Does running a client with LIBGL_DEBUG=verbose give any more interesting info as to whether you're actually using direct rendering? -- Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper)/ Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc) developer XFree86 and DRI project member / CS student, Free Software enthusiast -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
