Someone writes: > [the TC] seems] to be way more collaborative to me, than - once > again - immediatly escalating this to -vote and threatening a GR.
Dear Community Team: I am getting very fed up of the repeated accusations, by multiple people, that we "immediately escalated" this to -vote. As we stated clearly in our thread starter message, and have now explicitly documented in detail, we tried very hard in private emails. We tried asking nicely. We tried negotiating. We tried the DPL. Of course the previous attempts were, yes, private emails. Escalating to an unstructured moan on a public list would not have been sensible. The draft GR proposal is our last resort, but *must* be public. So that is why the first *public* thing is the GR proposal. Therefore these allegations are a gross misrepresentation of the facts. Indeed they are made in disregard of the facts. That these kind of things are being said by multiple people is no excuse. Indeed, it makes the situation worse. People are entitled to disagree with us about timescales, but hyperbolic accusations like "immediately" are unacceptable. Please help. Ian. -- Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> These opinions are my own. Pronouns: they/he. If I emailed you from @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.
