On 06.04.25 13:21, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
Because you do not think it neccessary by force implies that everyone has to think so?
Note that we can easily flip that statement. Because in effect, *just* because you think it's necessary everybody *does* have to think so, regardless of whether it's actually security theater without tangible benefit or not.
I can't blame Jan for publicly reiterating that it's not. He did his part of what y'all agreed on despite his opinion that it's busywork. The ball's been in your court for a while now.
always directly coming around with GRs and overrule.
You know that's not true either.Frankly, which other recourse does a DD have, in your opinion, if they think a team is obstructing what they see as a valuable contribution to Debian and the DPL (who arguably does have the authority to kick the whole FTP team out and appoint somebody else) doesn't want to put his foot down?
-- -- regards -- -- Matthias Urlichs
BEGIN:VCARD VERSION:4.0 N:Urlichs;Matthias;;; NICKNAME:Smurf EMAIL;PREF=1:matth...@urlichs.de TEL;TYPE=work;VALUE=TEXT:+49 911 59818 0 URL;TYPE=home:https://matthias.urlichs.de END:VCARD
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
