Quoting Nikolaus Rath (2014-10-20 05:29:10)
> Jonas Smedegaard <d...@jones.dk> writes:
>> Quoting Nikolaus Rath (2014-10-19 20:21:59)
>>> Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> writes:
>>>> David Weinehall writes ("Re: Alternative proposal: support for alternative
>>>> init systems is desirable but not mandatory"):
>>>>> OK, so packaging uselessd (thus providing another init system that
>>>>> provides -- most of -- the systemd interfaces) would solve all
>>>>> your worries?
>>>>
>>>> This resolution will be interpreted by humans, specifically
>>>> individual maintainers, the TC, and the release team - not by
>>>> robots.
>>>
>>> Presumably some maintainers would consider uselessd an alternate
>>> init system - and others will not. In that case the GR seems have
>>> achieved effectively nothing.
>>
>> If there was a secret agenda e.g. to annoy systemd then you are right
>> that such trick that you now thought up would mean that this GR was a
>> waste of time.
>
> I just don't understand why you consider uselessd a "trick" that I
> came up with (leaving alone the fact that David brought it up here,
> and that yet another guy started the project).For the record: I don't consider uselessd a trick¹. On the contrary, I agree with Russ that it might be a quite interesting init system. You are right that I confused you and David. Sorry about that! - Jonas ¹ What I reflected on was how a question was phrased which included this project, not the project itself. -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: signature
