Hi, Ian Jackson: > or it might be that all > our daemon packages end up adopting some common startup framework > whose implementation in the sysvinit package is buggy or defective, or > something. > Mmh. s/all/many/ s/adopting some common startup framework/using socket activation/, which *surprise* is only implemented by systemd. (Disregarding upstart's defective version of same for the moment.)
> I think naming any particular init in this GR is not a good idea. So we should use convoluted wording instead, and leave it to every DD to mentally substitute the convolutions with systemd / sys5rc as appropriate? I don't know what that's supposed to achieve, but then I don't know what your GR is supposed to achieve either, so I suppose that's all right. :-P -- -- Matthias Urlichs
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
