Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> writes:
> David Weinehall writes ("Re: Alternative proposal: support for alternative
> init systems is desirable but not mandatory"):
>> OK, so packaging uselessd (thus providing another init system that
>> provides -- most of -- the systemd interfaces) would solve all your
>> worries?
>
> This resolution will be interpreted by humans, specifically individual
> maintainers, the TC, and the release team - not by robots.
Presumably some maintainers would consider uselessd an alternate init
system - and others will not. In that case the GR seems have achieved
effectively nothing.
Best,
-Nikolaus
--
GPG encrypted emails preferred. Key id: 0xD113FCAC3C4E599F
Fingerprint: ED31 791B 2C5C 1613 AF38 8B8A D113 FCAC 3C4E 599F
»Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a Banana.«
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/87lhobdins....@vostro.rath.org
