Jonas Smedegaard <d...@jones.dk> writes: > Quoting Nikolaus Rath (2014-10-19 20:16:37) >> Jonas Smedegaard <d...@jones.dk> writes: >>> Quoting David Weinehall (2014-10-19 16:13:18) >>>> On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 02:28:02PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: >>>> [snip] >>>> >>>>> The wording in my resolution comes from the TC discussion and >>>>> specifies `at least one' or `some alternative'. To represent that >>>>> as `all' is IMO misleading. >>>>> >>>>> One important difference between `all' and `at least one' is this: >>>>> suppose there is some init system that does not support the common >>>>> interface you suppose in your point (2). Saying `all' suggests >>>>> that it is somehow the fault of the packages which deal with the >>>>> common interface. This point was raised in the TC discussion. >>>>> >>>>> Saying `all' gives the impression that every package must do work >>>>> for each init system. That is why my proposal's wording simply >>>>> says that packages are forbidden from requiring `a specific' init >>>>> system. >>>> >>>> OK, so packaging uselessd (thus providing another init system that >>>> provides -- most of -- the systemd interfaces) would solve all your >>>> worries? >>> >>> There are many ways to twist words, yes. >> >> I think this deserves a better answer. >> >> Do you consider uselessd to be the same init system as systemd? To me >> this looks like a legitimate fork. >> >> Or are you saying that "at least one" is really meant to mean "at least >> one not-systemd derived"? > > My concern is not systemd specifically - on the contrary I find it great > if it brings more choice to Debian, which seems to be the status > currently. > > My concern is also not the risk that Debian could be locked into "only > two" or "only three" init systems - I believe we need not deal with that > until the risk of such scenario eventually becomes realistic - if we > then concider such scenario a concern. > > My concern now is to ensure that Debian supports more than a single init > system. > > I sincerely hope that I made myself more clear this time, and that you > found my response adequate and we can move on.
Not really, I'm afraid (although you're of course free to move on). I am still wondering, if Debian would support only uselessd and systemd, would you consider that "more than one init system" or not? And if not, why not? Best, -Nikolaus -- GPG encrypted emails preferred. Key id: 0xD113FCAC3C4E599F Fingerprint: ED31 791B 2C5C 1613 AF38 8B8A D113 FCAC 3C4E 599F »Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a Banana.« -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/87iojfctso....@vostro.rath.org