MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The > main things tested by NM now seem to be tolerance of boredom, stupid > questions and poor social skills of DDs, along with the ability to > paraphrase from key docs, which are not really key indicators of who > will be a good DD.
When I passed NM in early 2003 (I think), it was completely different to that. Can you point me to the information what has changed? Or may it be that this depends very much on the AM? Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
