Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > > If you want to improve the NM process, fine, the NM team awaits your help.
> > > But don't block other initiatives to improve Debian for reasons which
> > > are dubious.
> >
> > So my reasons are dubious? I guess I should let you vote for me and just
> > sign the ballot since your reasons are more reasonable than mine? I
> > thought we're discussing here?
>
> We're discussing, but your objections are rather superficial IMO.
> It looks like "it would be best if we could have integrated that more
> tightly in the NM process and I'm not sure if we couldn't do better" and
> not an objection like "this is broken because X and Y".
>
> So I suggest you to not stand up against this proposition if you're not
> convinced that this would negatively impact Debian. It might be that it
> doesn't have as much success as I expect, but then we haven't lost much by
> tring it out.
I wonder why/how we managed to degrade this discussion into a sparkling
flame with personal attacks ('your reasons are dubious', 'don't stand
against it') so quickly.
Regards,
Joey
--
If nothing changes, everything will remain the same. -- Barne's Law
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
