On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 05:17:01PM +0100, Julien BLACHE wrote: >Hi DPL candidates,
Hi Julien, >The kFreeBSD ports are now in a good enough shape to be included in >unstable. Aurélien Jarno got ftpmaster's approval for that during an >informal conversation at debconf5 [1] but so far, there's been no >progress on this front. > >Since then, the SCC split happened and ftp-master moved to ries, so >adding more architectures to the archive is no longer a problem, AIUI. > >Hence, what is your position on including those new, non-Linux ports ? >What would the timeframe be like, according to you ? I have no problem with including them, but equally I don't see them as a very high priority *right* now. After Etch is released, I'd happily support proposals for inclusion. >If an ftpmaster was to charge an amount of money to include the new >architectures (as was the case for amd64), what would, according to >you, be a reasonable amount ? I don't expect that money should be needed for this sort of thing. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Support the Campaign for Audiovisual Free Expression: http://www.eff.org/cafe/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
