On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 06:13:28PM +1000, Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> wrote: > But what I mean is more that maintaining two simple Debian patches (one > for Linux, one for kFreeBSD) is probably simpler than maintaining one > complicated Debian patch (with some conditional make cruft). And probably > more importantly, it means that you can do immediately upload stuff for > kfreebsd without *any* risk of breaking the Linux version. And even if > you do autoimport patches from Linux to kFreeBSD, you have the option > of not uploading the source for BSD unless it does actually build for BSD.
All this applies to the Hurd, and yet, it is an official port. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
