Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> wrote: > Personally, due to things like [0], I tend to think having different > sources for different OSes is likely to make sense; which isn't something > we can manage with the main archive as it stands.
I disagree here. Building for different OSes from the same source will improve portability and quality. We have a long history of helping make free software more portable accross architectures, let's just take it to the next step. As for the number of developers, there are a couple more than is told on the qualification page, although obviously not all of them are DDs (but that can be fixed). I think we'll attract even more people once kFreeBSD will be an official port. Also, consider that kFreeBSD enthusiasts will probably join some of the biggest maintenance teams to help out with kFreeBSD issues, which will also benefit to the current Linux ports. And I truly hope Sun will re-license OpenSolaris under the GPL so we can have an official OpenSolaris port too. JB. -- Julien BLACHE - Debian & GNU/Linux Developer - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Public key available on <http://www.jblache.org> - KeyID: F5D6 5169 GPG Fingerprint : 935A 79F1 C8B3 3521 FD62 7CC7 CD61 4FD7 F5D6 5169 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
