Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> Le jeu 21 septembre 2006 20:44, Graham Wilson a écrit :
> > On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 07:10:25PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > > I'd say that I'm not more comfortable with Steve McIntyre beeing
> > > involved and a DPL-assistant (or whatever name his position has)
> > > either, so if Aj stops beeing involved with dunc-tank, (1) is in
> > > fact half solved.
> >
> > Then shouldn't those who are attempting to recall aj also try to
> > remove Steve from his delegate position? Because, as of now, it seems
> > (based on the GRs on the table) that the only problem people have is
> > with aj's involvement.
>
> Technically, if Aj is deposed, steve will be as well. And as I said,
> if Aj is retiring from dunc-tank, then Steve's position has to be
> clarified in a second stage IMHO yes. Nothing has been done "against"
> Steve's position as DPL-Assistant, especially because it's
> not "allowed" in the constitution.
Umh? Why would Steve be disposed as well? I'm missing a crucial bit
here, I guess.
Regards,
Joey
--
This is GNU/Linux Country. On a quiet night, you can hear Windows reboot.
Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
