Le ven 22 septembre 2006 04:20, Steve Langasek a écrit : > > that's a big conflict of interest. It's IMHO a major fault coming > > from a delegate (and especially the DPL) to take a role in such an > > organisation. It's just not compatible. > > Um, terminology disconnect here; the DPL isn't a delegate, the DPL is > the DPL. > > And if you're really claiming that no one who holds any delegated > position in Debian should be allowed to be involved in any > organization that funds Debian developers... I quite frankly find > that to be an insane position to hold. I can only imagine it > decreasing the number of people willing to serve Debian in a delegate > capacity.
Like said on IRC yesterday, what I meant is a delegate with decision powers in debian + the DPL (who is technically not a delegate). So there is quite few, only the DPL, his asssistant, and maybe the Secretary. -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O [EMAIL PROTECTED] OOO http://www.madism.org
pgpQF84ho29ns.pgp
Description: PGP signature
