Le jeu 21 septembre 2006 20:44, Graham Wilson a écrit : > On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 07:10:25PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > > I'd say that I'm not more comfortable with Steve McIntyre beeing > > involved and a DPL-assistant (or whatever name his position has) > > either, so if Aj stops beeing involved with dunc-tank, (1) is in > > fact half solved. > > Then shouldn't those who are attempting to recall aj also try to > remove Steve from his delegate position? Because, as of now, it seems > (based on the GRs on the table) that the only problem people have is > with aj's involvement.
Technically, if Aj is deposed, steve will be as well. And as I said, if Aj is retiring from dunc-tank, then Steve's position has to be clarified in a second stage IMHO yes. Nothing has been done "against" Steve's position as DPL-Assistant, especially because it's not "allowed" in the constitution. -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O [EMAIL PROTECTED] OOO http://www.madism.org
pgp77wFZEe5hM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
