Graham Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Is this a suitable compromise? Are there enough people upset with > dunc-tank to even try to reach a compromise on the issue?
As I stated elsewhere (and was ignored by AJ at least once), I am not particularly troubled by paying the RMs, but - as I understand it - the dunc-tank model is flawed. I'd welcome a pragmatic attempt to find a compromise, but I expect standing-aside is the most we can get from some developers with irreconcilable objections to the concept. Nevertheless, the DPL procedures have been totally screwed-up again, so I would still support recalling AJ. Sorry if that's not what you wanted to hear, -- MJR/slef My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/ Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
